About Zach
As my redux articles have become something of standard fare around here I want to try and make sure that their purpose and my aims in writing them are not misinterpreted. Actually, I notice that a great many readers (lookers) do miss my purpose and misunderstand the content of the articles each and every time one appears on this site. This is because these individuals do not care to learn and, therefore, Check out a link do not read the articles (or likely anything else), but only look at the pictures. Big mistake.
While I’ll never be able to change the fact that many refuse to actually read the articles and only look at the images they contain (much of the Digg population is especially guilty of this), perhaps I can shed more light on things for everyone else.
Let me begin with a few things that these articles are not. First and foremost, they are not comprehensive, contextually accurate redesign exercises. If you read the articles, you’ll notice that I always cite the fact that I am using the article to highlight some specific or general design flaws and show an example (not the example) of how to remedy those flaws. Notice, however, that these flaws
Links
Lists are useful and should be ensured to fit and such, yeah?
- One
- Two
- Three
- Four
- What's a much much longer way of saying five, you know like one plus two plus two is what? Five biatches